College sabbaticals deserve more respect
The Detroit News March 12 article, "Professors paid not to teach," is discussed by readers in the "Letters: Your Opinion section."
---Lizabeth A. Barclay, professor of management at Oakland University, takes issue with the story's charge that professors have light teaching loads and a lot of spare time. Barclay writes, "My colleagues and I teach five courses per year. I do all my own grading. During the fall and winter, I often spend 60 hours a week working, as do many of my colleagues." She adds that sabbaticals are a way to move her research up a notch.
---Susan Wood, professor of art History at Oakland University, says she has noticed that many of The News reporters' bylines do not appear every day. "Clearly, on some days of the week, The News must be paying them not to write. What an inefficient and outrageous waste of your readers' and advertisers' money."
---Jeff Jenks writes that sabbaticals allow faculty to update their knowledge and skills every seven years, then students receive new current and contemporary ideas, theory and experience.
---John Ellis writes that the article made him think about the time it took The News to submit Freedom of Information Act requests, dig up statistics, conduct interviews, sort through the information and the many other tasks it took to prepare the article. "Was the reporter paid for this time away from the word processor? If so, perhaps The News' follow-up piece should be 'Journalist paid not to write.'"